2022 Volvo S60 B5 AWD

The CarCody take

The 2022 Volvo S60 B5 AWD is a gasoline compact car with all-wheel drive, a 2.0 L turbocharged four-cylinder engine and an eight-speed automatic transmission. EPA fuel economy is 25 MPG city, 33 MPG highway and 28 MPG combined. Its listed EPA annual fuel cost is $2,950, while tailpipe CO2 is 316 grams per mile. The S60 B5 AWD is based on the S60. Its NHTSA overall safety rating is five stars; the listed frontal rating is four stars, and the side crash and rollover ratings are five stars each. The entry lists four recalls and 15 complaints. These figures provide a fuel-use and annual-cost snapshot alongside the available safety ratings and NHTSA counts for buyers weighing this AWD sedan.

Who it suits. It suits buyers seeking a gasoline compact car with all-wheel drive who want fuel economy, annual fuel cost and listed safety ratings in view.

Overview

The 2022 Volvo S60 B5 AWD is a gasoline-powered compact car with all-wheel drive and an automatic transmission. Its 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbo engine pairs with an eight-speed automatic. The EPA rates it at 25 mpg in city driving, 33 mpg on the highway and 28 mpg combined. Those figures offer a concise basis for comparing its fuel use with other cars.

The EPA lists annual fuel costs of $2,950 and tailpipe carbon dioxide emissions of 316 grams per mile. These are useful reference points for buyers weighing recurring fuel expense and direct emissions. The annual cost is an EPA estimate, not a quoted fuel price or guarantee of an individual owner's spending.

Key features

• 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder gasoline engine
• All-wheel drive
• Eight-speed automatic transmission
• EPA fuel economy: 25 mpg city, 33 mpg highway, 28 mpg combined
• EPA tailpipe emissions: 316 g CO2 per mile

Who it's for

The S60 B5 AWD is relevant to shoppers considering a compact car with all-wheel drive who want a clear view of its official fuel economy and estimated annual fuel cost. Its 28 mpg combined rating and $2,950 EPA annual fuel-cost figure give buyers practical reference points for budgeting, while its gasoline powertrain distinguishes it from electric options. The EPA city and highway ratings also let drivers consider how their mix of driving may relate to the combined figure.

Dealers, fleets and garages may also find the model's basic configuration and official running-cost measures useful when comparing vehicles. The available facts identify the engine, transmission, drive layout, emissions and safety ratings, but do not establish service requirements, ownership reliability or operating costs beyond EPA fuel cost.

Pros and cons

Pros

• All-wheel drive is part of the stated configuration.
• The 25/33/28 mpg city/highway/combined ratings make fuel-economy comparisons straightforward.
• EPA annual fuel cost and tailpipe CO2 figures provide additional running-cost and emissions context.
• NHTSA lists a five-star overall safety rating.

Cons

• The EPA's $2,950 annual fuel-cost estimate is a notable budget consideration for buyers comparing running costs.
• Tailpipe emissions are listed at 316 g CO2 per mile.
• Available ratings provide no evidence here about reliability, maintenance expense or real-world fuel economy.

Alternatives

Shoppers exploring Volvo's electric models can compare the 2027 Volvo EX60 P10 AWD electric, the 2027 Volvo EX60 P6 electric and the 2027 Volvo EX90. For related Volvo models and versions, see Volvo cars.

Verdict

The 2022 Volvo S60 B5 AWD is defined here by a straightforward combination of gasoline power, all-wheel drive and an automatic transmission. Its official 28 mpg combined rating, $2,950 annual EPA fuel-cost estimate and 316 g-per-mile tailpipe CO2 figure make it possible to assess fuel use and emissions without relying on unverified real-world claims.

Safety figures are mixed by category but strong overall: NHTSA gives the car five stars overall, five for side crash performance, four for frontal crash performance and five for rollover resistance. NHTSA lists four recalls and 15 complaints. Those counts are useful context, but alone they do not explain the nature, severity or applicability of any particular issue. Buyers should weigh the documented ratings alongside their priorities for drivetrain, fuel budget and safety information.