The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →The 2026 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid has the better EPA-estimated fuel economy in every like-for-like comparison listed for U.S. models. Its front-wheel-drive trims reach 43 mpg combined versus 40 mpg for the comparable Honda CR-V Hybrid 2WD trims. Among the listed mainstream all-wheel-drive versions, the RAV4 leads 42 to 37 mpg combined. In the more rugged Woodland-versus-TrailSport comparison, it leads 38 to 35 mpg. The exact advantage depends on drivetrain and trim, so model year and configuration must stay attached to every number.
Those are official 2026 U.S. EPA estimates, not promises for every driver. Your result can change with traffic, weather, tires, payload, maintenance, driving style and battery condition. Still, when the vehicles are matched by the published drivetrain and trim groups, the RAV4 is the clear fuel-economy leader.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What the 2026 comparison shows
This comparison covers 2026 model-year vehicles sold in the United States. The figures are EPA-estimated miles per gallon (mpg), shown as city / highway / combined. Honda’s 2026 comparison identifies the CR-V figures as 2026 EPA mileage ratings and lists the trim-specific RAV4 ratings alongside them.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
| Like-for-like comparison | Toyota RAV4 Hybrid | Honda CR-V Hybrid | RAV4 advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front-wheel drive/2WD mainstream trims | 47 / 40 / 43 mpg (RAV4 LE, SE, XLE, XLE Premium FWD) | 43 / 36 / 40 mpg (CR-V Sport Hybrid and Sport-L Hybrid 2WD) | 3 mpg combined; 4 city; 4 highway |
| Mainstream all-wheel drive | 46 / 39 / 42 mpg (RAV4 LE and SE AWD) | 40 / 34 / 37 mpg (CR-V Sport, Sport-L and Sport Touring Hybrid AWD) | 5 mpg combined; 6 city; 5 highway |
| Rugged-oriented all-wheel drive | 41 / 35 / 38 mpg (RAV4 Woodland AWD) | 38 / 33 / 35 mpg (CR-V TrailSport Hybrid AWD) | 3 mpg combined; 3 city; 2 highway |
On the published ratings, the RAV4 is higher in city, highway and combined economy in all three configuration groups. The largest gap is in the mainstream AWD comparison, where the RAV4’s combined rating is five mpg higher.
#1 Best Overall
- Never Let a Dead Battery Ruin Your Drive. The LISEN 4 in 1 Retractable Car Charger delivers reliable power for your entire journey. Compatible with standard 12V cigarette lighter sockets, it keeps phones, tablets, and devices charged during daily commutes, road trips, and long drives — the perfect practical gift for dads, truck drivers, and anyone who lives on the road.
- Daily Driver Essential: Always Ready When You Need It. Featuring two retractable cables ( USB C & Old iPhone Charging Cable ) that extend up to 31.5 inches and dual USB ports, this charger solves cable clutter while charging up to 4 devices simultaneously. Ideal for busy fathers, commuters, and families who want a tidy car and never worry about low battery again.
- Deliver full-speed PD fast charging for iPhone 18 Pro Max & iPhone 18 Pro Max & iPhone 18 Pro right inside your car. The built-in 45W PD USB-C port hits the peak charging speed for these latest iPhone models, juicing up your phone to 50% power in just 15 minutes while you drive.(Note: Maximum 45W PD output is available under 24V vehicle power supply. When used with standard 12V car sockets, the peak output is limited to 36W.)
- Standard 12V Power Solution: Designed as a dedicated USB power supply for charging devices. Note: Does NOT support CarPlay, Bluetooth, or data transfer. Compatible with most phones, tablets, and small electronics. This retractable charger is a core car organization tool, keeping your vehicle tidy. Not compatible with Micro-USB devices.
- Clutter-Free Tech Organization: Featuring dual USB ports and retractable cables, the LISEN 4 in 1 charger provides a clean car storage solution. Perfect for truck enthusiasts or as a thoughtful gift for drivers, it supports fast USB-C charging for devices like the iPhone 18Pro & iPhone 18 ProMax. Keep your vehicle organized while ensuring efficient power delivery for all your tech on the road.
The comparison is meaningful only when the drivetrain and general equipment level are aligned. A FWD RAV4 should be compared with a 2WD CR-V, while an AWD RAV4 should be compared with an AWD CR-V. Likewise, the Woodland and TrailSport figures describe their particular trims rather than every AWD vehicle in either range.
Every trim and drivetrain rating
2026 Honda CR-V Hybrid ratings
| CR-V Hybrid configuration | EPA city / highway / combined | 2026 MSRP including destination |
|---|---|---|
| Sport Hybrid 2WD | 43 / 36 / 40 mpg | $37,025 |
| Sport Hybrid AWD | 40 / 34 / 37 mpg | $38,525 |
| TrailSport Hybrid AWD | 38 / 33 / 35 mpg | $40,195 |
| Sport-L Hybrid 2WD | 43 / 36 / 40 mpg | $40,120 |
| Sport-L Hybrid AWD | 40 / 34 / 37 mpg | $41,620 |
| Sport Touring Hybrid AWD | 40 / 34 / 37 mpg | $43,645 |
The CR-V prices above come from Honda’s 2026 release and include a stated $1,395 destination charge. They are manufacturer suggested retail prices before taxes, licensing, registration, options and dealer price variation. The release supplies these CR-V prices; the comparison material used here does not provide corresponding RAV4 MSRPs, so a price advantage cannot be inferred from this table.
Notice that the Sport Hybrid and Sport-L Hybrid have the same 2WD rating despite their different list prices. The AWD Sport, Sport-L and Sport Touring also share the same published 40/34/37 rating. That does not mean their equipment or transaction prices are identical; it means Honda assigns the same EPA estimate to each listed drivetrain group.
2026 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid ratings
| RAV4 Hybrid configuration | EPA city / highway / combined |
|---|---|
| LE, SE, XLE and XLE Premium, FWD | 47 / 40 / 43 mpg |
| LE and SE, AWD | 46 / 39 / 42 mpg |
| Woodland, AWD | 41 / 35 / 38 mpg |
These are the RAV4 trim groups listed in Honda’s current 2026 side-by-side comparison. They are not a single rating for every RAV4 Hybrid; equipment and drivetrain change the estimate. A buyer should verify the exact rating on the vehicle’s window sticker or official specification page before signing a deal.
Which model is best for city driving?
The RAV4 has the higher EPA city rating in each matched group. The FWD RAV4 reaches 47 mpg city, four mpg above the CR-V’s 43 mpg city. In the mainstream AWD comparison, the RAV4’s 46 mpg city is six mpg higher than the CR-V’s 40. The Woodland’s 41 mpg city is three mpg above the TrailSport’s 38.
City ratings are the relevant column if your routine involves frequent stops, lower average speeds and short urban trips. They remain estimates rather than a promise for a particular commute. Traffic, weather, payload, tire pressure, accessory use and driving style can move actual consumption away from the laboratory result.
The city advantage is especially important for drivers who spend most of their time in congestion. Even so, avoid treating the city figure as an annual average unless nearly all of your mileage is urban. Mixed commuting should be evaluated with the combined number, while a mostly rural or interstate route may track more closely with the highway estimate.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Which model is best on the highway?
The RAV4 also leads on the highway column. FWD versions are rated 40 mpg highway versus 36 for the CR-V 2WD. The mainstream AWD RAV4 is rated 39 versus 34 for the comparable CR-V AWD trims. Woodland and TrailSport are closer, at 35 and 33 mpg highway respectively.
Rank #2
- High Quality Material: The coaster is made of environmentally friendly silicone, safe, non-toxic and odorless. Soft with toughness, easily embedded in the cup holder. Very durable, wear-resistant, long service life. High temperature resistance, can withstand 100 ℃ high temperature water cups.
- Wide Compatibility: The coaster has a diameter of 3.15 inches and a height of 1.18 inches, which is widely used in most vehicles, such as SUV, sedan, MPV, etc., as long as the size fits your car cup holder.
- Protection Function: Our car cup holder coaster has a carry handle design and a stand-up ring edge on its edge to effectively prevent food crumbs, drinks and water from leaking out and preventing the car cup holder from getting dirty.Meanwhile,Thickened design effectively prevents the cup holder from being scratched by the cup when driving on bumpy roads and eliminates the annoying thumping sound, making your journey more enjoyable.
- Easy to Use and Clean: With embedded installation, you just need to put it flat on the car cupholder. It is also very quick to remove, there is a small bump on the coaster, pinch it and you can easily remove the coaster. It is very easy to clean, rinse with water or wipe with a wet towel (be careful not to clean with sharp tools).
- 100% Satisfaction: Our products have quality assurance, if you have questions or are not satisfied after receiving the product, don't worry, please contact us as soon as possible, we provide after-sales service.
Use the highway column when long-distance, steady-speed travel dominates your annual mileage. A driver who mixes city and highway travel should use the combined figure as the primary comparison, then check these separate columns to see whether one model better matches the route.
Highway results can be affected by sustained high speeds, headwinds, cold temperatures, roof-mounted equipment and a full passenger or cargo load. Those influences apply to both vehicles, so they do not erase the published comparison, but they can make the actual gap smaller or larger for an individual trip.
What the mpg gap means in fuel use
Because mpg is a ratio, a three- or five-mpg difference is not a fixed number of gallons saved in every situation. The simplest way to compare fuel use is to divide the same distance by each vehicle’s combined rating.
Recommended Free Tools
- For every 1,000 miles, a 43-mpg RAV4 FWD uses about 23.3 gallons at its EPA rating, while a 40-mpg CR-V 2WD uses 25 gallons. That is roughly 1.7 gallons fewer for the RAV4 over that distance.
- At 42 mpg versus 37 mpg, the mainstream AWD comparison is about 23.8 gallons versus 27.0 gallons per 1,000 miles, a difference of approximately 3.2 gallons.
- At 38 mpg versus 35 mpg, Woodland and TrailSport use about 26.3 and 28.6 gallons per 1,000 miles, respectively, a difference of roughly 2.3 gallons.
These are mathematical illustrations of the EPA ratings, not measured road results. To estimate your own annual fuel use, divide expected annual miles by the exact combined rating. Then multiply gallons by the fuel price you actually pay. Use the same mileage and price assumptions for both vehicles so the comparison is fair.
The higher-rated RAV4 does not automatically produce a lower total ownership cost. A higher purchase price, financing rate, insurance premium, taxes, registration, maintenance or options can outweigh fuel savings. Fuel prices also vary by location and over time, so calculate the difference using your local price rather than a national assumption.
Why drivetrain and trim change the result
Front-wheel drive versus 2WD
Honda labels the CR-V configuration “2WD” in its 2026 material; the comparable RAV4 configurations are labeled FWD. In the published ratings, the RAV4 FWD group is 47/40/43 and the CR-V 2WD group is 43/36/40. That is a three-mpg combined advantage for Toyota, not a comparison between a highly equipped AWD vehicle and a lighter two-wheel-drive vehicle.
If you do not need all-wheel drive, the two-wheel-drive groups provide the highest rating for each model in this comparison. Choosing AWD for traction, weather or personal preference changes the relevant numbers and usually lowers the estimate for both vehicles.
Mainstream all-wheel drive
Adding all-wheel drive lowers both vehicles’ estimates relative to their two-wheel-drive or front-wheel-drive counterparts. The listed RAV4 LE and SE AWD trims are rated 46/39/42, while the CR-V Sport, Sport-L and Sport Touring AWD trims are rated 40/34/37. The five-mpg combined gap is the widest of the three matched comparisons.
Rank #3
- ✅【Designed for Magsafe】 - The most fashionable iphone car mount in 2026 Magsafe is designed for iPhone 18 Pro Max/17/16/15/14/13/12 Pro Max Mini and official Magsafe cases and other magnetic phone cases and can be fixed directly to these phones without the need to affix metal plates. All Android Phones Will Work: Metal rings are provided; they fit cases and other phones without magsafe. Based on Unique Grandmaster Design (Protected by US Design Patent No. US D1,112,194 S)
- ✅【STRONG MAGNETIC MagSafe Car Mount】 - This powerful magnetic phone holder can create a powerful attraction that firmly supports your device while allowing you to drive without distraction. it easily and securely holds your phone through bumps, sharp turns or even sudden stops, no worrying of dropping your phone.
- ✅【SUPER STICK FORCE】 - VHB Dash Mounted Holders adhesive provides strong stick force between the dashboard and the car phone holder, which can firmly stick to any plane in the car, fix your device, adapt to a variety of road conditions such as sudden braking, speed bump, and rugged mountain road.
- ✅【SAFE DRIVING VIEW】 - Mini-size, not taking up space, it is placed in the dashboard without blocking the view at all, and does not need to look down at the device to ensure your safe driving. Cell Phone Car Mount is suitable for most cars, pickups, SUV, taxi; It is the best assistant for Uber and Lyft drivers
- ✅【360° FREE ROTATION】 - With an adjustable swivel ball joint, you can rotate your smartphone or device at your own will, providing the best viewing angle. Quickly pick and place with one hand, free your hands and make calls and GPS navigation more convenient
Do not assume that every AWD trim has the same rating as the LE or SE RAV4, or that every CR-V AWD has the same rating as the mainstream group. The official tables identify the specific trims included, and a different wheel, tire or equipment combination can carry a different certified value.
Woodland versus TrailSport
The Woodland and TrailSport are the lower-rated AWD configurations in their respective model lines in this comparison. RAV4 Woodland is rated 41/35/38; CR-V TrailSport is 38/33/35. Their three-mpg combined difference is smaller than the mainstream AWD gap, but the RAV4 still leads in all three columns.
Do not apply the Woodland result to every AWD RAV4 or the TrailSport result to every AWD CR-V. Trim-specific ratings exist because vehicles within the same model range are not configured identically. If capability or styling leads you to one of these trims, compare those trims directly rather than using the highest rating in the model family.
What the EPA ratings do—and do not—tell you
Honda’s official comparison says the estimates are for comparison purposes and warns: “Your mileage will vary depending on how you drive and maintain your vehicle, driving conditions, battery-pack age/condition and other factors.” That qualification applies to using these numbers as a shopping tool.
- The ratings are official manufacturer-published EPA estimates, not independent same-route test results.
- No single driver should expect to reproduce the exact city, highway or combined number.
- Compare vehicles using the same model year, drivetrain and trim category; otherwise the apparent gap can reflect configuration rather than the model line alone.
- EPA estimates are market- and model-year-specific. The figures here apply to U.S. 2026 vehicles and should not be transferred to another country or model year without checking that market’s official ratings.
- Hybrid battery age and condition can affect actual economy over time, as can maintenance, tire pressure and seasonal temperatures.
The comparison available here does not include an independently measured 2026 RAV4-versus-CR-V route test. Therefore, the defensible answer to “which gets better fuel economy?” is the published EPA result: RAV4 leads in every listed matched configuration.
How to choose the right comparison before buying
- Choose the drivetrain first. Decide whether you need FWD/2WD or AWD. Do not compare a FWD RAV4 rating with an AWD CR-V rating and call the difference a model advantage.
- Match the equipment level. The published groups pair several trims, but the exact equipment, wheels and other specifications can vary. Confirm the window sticker for the vehicle actually in stock.
- Use the column that reflects your driving. Check city mpg for stop-and-go use, highway mpg for long steady trips and combined mpg for a mixed commute.
- Check the model year and market. A 2026 U.S. estimate is not a current rating for a 2025 vehicle or a non-U.S. version.
- Compare the out-the-door deal. Add destination, taxes, registration, options, financing and dealer charges to the list price. Honda’s listed CR-V prices include the stated destination charge, but not those other costs.
- Calculate your own fuel scenario. Use expected annual miles and a realistic local fuel price for both vehicles rather than assuming the EPA gap alone determines savings.
- Record the exact trim. Save the window-sticker rating, drivetrain and vehicle identification details. This prevents an advertised rating for one trim from being used to evaluate another.
- Consider use beyond economy. If you require AWD or a rugged-oriented trim, compare the lower-rated configurations directly and decide whether their equipment justifies the fuel trade-off.
Common comparison mistakes
The most frequent error is quoting a model-wide mpg number without naming the drivetrain. The RAV4 range in this comparison spans 43 mpg combined for listed FWD trims, 42 for listed mainstream AWD trims and 38 for Woodland AWD. The CR-V spans 40 for 2WD, 37 for mainstream AWD and 35 for TrailSport AWD. A single uncategorized number hides those differences.
Another mistake is treating MSRP as the amount you will pay. Honda’s listed prices include the $1,395 destination charge but exclude taxes, licensing, registration, options and dealer variation. No corresponding RAV4 prices are established here, so a fuel-economy lead should not be presented as a purchase-price lead.
Finally, avoid using an older article’s ratings without checking its model year. Certification values can change, and the 2024 RAV4 figures differ substantially from the 2026 figures listed in the current comparison.
Rank #4
- Buyer's Guide: The seat guard for car seat between seat & console measures 15.75*2.7*1.53", suitable for gaps of 1.43-1.53" in width, please double-check carefully the distance between your seat and the center console before placing an order
- Storage and Filling in One: Differ from traditional single-function gap fillers, gap filler for car incorporates storage function, offers you the convenience of storing phones and various other items, so that you can access them at any time while driving
- Avoid Items Slipping: With the bumps and vibrations of the car, phones, keys may fall into the seat crevices, which is difficult to pick up, and distracts the driver's attention. Car gap seat filler fills gaps seamlessly to create an effective barrier
- Easy to Install: Car side seat gap filler is easy to install, simply insert it into the gap between the seat and the center console, gap seat filler for car can fit tightly without affecting the normal adjustment of the seat and the use of the seat belt
- Premium Material: Crafted from premium EVA material, our car seat side gap filler boasts a combination of wear-resistant, softness&durability. Maintenance is effortless, simply rinse and wipe to quickly clean the dust and debris in corners and crevices
Why older RAV4-versus-CR-V articles can give a different answer
Model-year changes make historical figures unsafe to reuse. Toyota’s 2024 comparison listed RAV4 Hybrid ratings up to 41 city / 38 highway / 39 combined mpg, with the Woodland at 38/35/37. The same historical comparison listed the CR-V Hybrid at 43/36/40 for 2WD and 40/34/37 for AWD.
Those 2024 numbers are not the 2026 ratings in the current comparison. The 2026 RAV4 figures shown here reach 47/40/43 for the listed FWD trims, while the 2026 CR-V figures remain configuration-specific. Always identify the model year when quoting an mpg number, and check the official rating for the market where the vehicle will be registered.
Frequently asked questions
Does the RAV4 Hybrid beat the CR-V Hybrid in combined mpg?
Yes. The listed 2026 RAV4 FWD group is rated 43 mpg combined versus 40 for the CR-V 2WD group. The RAV4 leads 42 to 37 in the mainstream AWD comparison and 38 to 35 in the Woodland-versus-TrailSport comparison.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesWhich has better city fuel economy?
The RAV4 leads each matched city comparison: 47 versus 43 mpg for FWD/2WD, 46 versus 40 for mainstream AWD and 41 versus 38 for Woodland and TrailSport.
Which has better highway fuel economy?
The RAV4 also leads on the highway ratings: 40 versus 36 mpg for FWD/2WD, 39 versus 34 for mainstream AWD and 35 versus 33 for the rugged-oriented AWD trims.
Is the RAV4’s advantage the same on every trim?
No. The advantage changes with drivetrain and trim. The published combined gaps are three mpg for FWD/2WD, five mpg for mainstream AWD and three mpg for Woodland versus TrailSport. Other configurations should be checked individually.
Does AWD reduce fuel economy?
In the listed 2026 ratings, moving from two-wheel drive or front-wheel drive to AWD lowers the estimate for both model lines. The exact change depends on the trim group, so use the AWD rating for the vehicle you intend to buy.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Are these real-world test results?
No. They are official EPA estimates published for comparison. There is no same-route independent 2026 test represented here, and Honda cautions that actual mileage varies with driving, maintenance, conditions, battery condition and other factors.
Best Value
- 🔰 UPGRADED SIDE STORAGE DESIGN - Our console cover is thinner than the old one, universal for all seasons. There is an 8.66*5.12 inch storage pocket design on each left and right side, expanding the storage space, convenient and practical. Meet the storage needs of the main passenger seat, you can store your cell phone, keys, tissues, ID and some other small daily items.
- 🔰 PREMIUM MICROFIBER LEATHER MATERIAL - This car center console cover is made of quality microfiber leather material, soft and skin-friendly touch. Exquisite and fashionable diamond shaped stitching, every detail is in place. Inside the car center console cover is made of thickened memory foam, even after squeezing, it can slowly recover to its original shape.
- 🔰 RELIEVE DRIVING FATIGUE - The arm rest cover for car adopts ergonomic design, giving just the right amount of arm support, effectively dispersing elbow pressure and relieving driving fatigue. Protect your car's center console from getting dirty or scratched. Especially suitable for long time driving or long distance traveling, bringing you a new experience of relaxation and comfort!
- 🔰 NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSTALLATION - This car console cover is designed with an elastic band for a firm fit and not easy to shake. And the back side is full of protruding dots, which can effectively avoid the armrest cover from slipping and shifting. All you need to do is to open the center console cover, put the elastic band directly into the cover and then close it.
- 🔰 BUYER'S GUIDE - You will receive a car armrest storage box with the size of 12.13*7.80 inch, please measure the size of your car's armrest storage box before you buy. We have prepared five simple and beautiful colors for you, you can choose according to your own preferences. Suitable for most of the vehicles on the market, such as car, truck, SUV, RV, van, etc.
Can I compare a 2024 rating with a 2026 rating?
Not as a current, like-for-like answer. Model-year ratings can change. The 2024 RAV4 figures cited in Toyota’s older comparison are different from the 2026 RAV4 figures in the current U.S. comparison.
Do the CR-V prices show which vehicle is cheaper to own?
No. The listed CR-V MSRPs provide purchase context, but corresponding RAV4 prices and a complete ownership-cost analysis are not established here. Fuel, financing, insurance, maintenance, taxes, registration and transaction pricing all matter.
How should I estimate annual fuel savings?
Divide your expected annual miles by each vehicle’s exact combined mpg, then multiply each gallon total by the same local fuel price. Compare the resulting totals, and remember that actual consumption may differ from the EPA estimate.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchBottom line for 2026 shoppers
For U.S. 2026 hybrids, the Toyota RAV4 is the fuel-economy winner on the official EPA estimates supplied for this comparison. The advantage is 3 mpg combined for FWD/2WD, 5 mpg for the listed mainstream AWD trims, and 3 mpg for Woodland versus TrailSport AWD. The RAV4 also leads each city and highway column. Select the exact drivetrain and trim first, then weigh the mpg result against equipment, the actual transaction price and your own driving conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the RAV4 Hybrid beat the CR-V Hybrid in combined mpg?
Yes. The listed 2026 RAV4 leads in every matched drivetrain group: 43 versus 40 mpg for FWD/2WD, 42 versus 37 for mainstream AWD and 38 versus 35 for Woodland versus TrailSport AWD.
Which has better city fuel economy?
The RAV4 has the higher city rating in all three comparisons: 47 versus 43, 46 versus 40 and 41 versus 38 mpg.
Are these real-world test results?
No. They are official EPA estimates for 2026 U.S. vehicles. Actual mileage varies with driving style, conditions, maintenance, payload, tires and battery condition.
Does AWD change the comparison?
Yes. AWD lowers the published rating for both models, so compare AWD with AWD and FWD/2WD with FWD/2WD.
Can older model-year mpg figures be used?
No. Model-year ratings can change. Verify the official rating for the exact year, trim, drivetrain and market.
The Bottom Line
Bottom line: The 2026 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid has the higher EPA-estimated fuel economy in every listed U.S. comparison with the Honda CR-V Hybrid. Match drivetrain and trim, then evaluate the mpg difference alongside price, equipment and your actual driving conditions.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
