Attorney General Pam Bondi said Molotov cocktails thrown at Tesla dealerships “could be a weapon of mass destruction,” according to Gizmodo’s March 24, 2025, account of her Fox News appearance. That was a description of incendiary devices in the context of attacks on Tesla property—not evidence that peaceful Tesla Takedown demonstrators possessed weapons of mass destruction or were formally designated terrorists.
What did Pam Bondi say?
In a March 23, 2025, appearance on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo, Bondi said, as quoted by Gizmodo: “These are Molotov cocktails. That could be a weapon of mass destruction that they’re throwing in Tesla dealerships.” The quotation is reported by Gizmodo; it has not been independently checked here against a full broadcast transcript.
The wording matters: Bondi said a Molotov cocktail “could be” a WMD. Gizmodo’s account does not show that she said every protester had one, nor does the quotation establish a formal legal designation of the devices or of protesters.
Attacks on Tesla property were distinct from peaceful demonstrations
Gizmodo described reported attacks on Tesla property—including Molotov cocktails thrown at empty buildings and shots fired at unoccupied vehicles—alongside peaceful Tesla Takedown demonstrations. The demonstrations were associated with opposition to Elon Musk’s role and actions. They are not the same events as the attacks, and the article does not establish that peaceful demonstrators used incendiary devices.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems#1 Best Overall
- Used Book in Good Condition
Gizmodo reported that the FBI had asked the public to watch for suspicious activity around Tesla dealerships. It said that announcement followed “at least nine known incidents.” That is the outlet’s contemporaneous figure, not an independently verified FBI total; the primary FBI notice and complete incident record are not established by the sources cited here.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Was this an official “War on Terror” against Tesla protesters?
“War on Terror” is Gizmodo’s political analogy for the rhetoric, not the name of a formal government campaign against Tesla protesters. The distinction is important: Bondi’s reported statement concerned Molotov cocktails in the context of attacks on property, while the phrase in the headline evokes the post-9/11 counterterrorism era.
Rank #2
A 2018 White House statement on the first Trump administration’s WMD counterterrorism strategy said: “The President’s strategy addresses the need to disrupt and degrade the technical capabilities of terrorists plotting WMD attacks.” That strategy addressed terrorist access to weapons and associated materials; it does not establish a 2025 counterterrorism policy against peaceful Tesla demonstrators. See the White House statement on the WMD counterterrorism strategy.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
What the headline does—and does not—establish
- It does establish: Gizmodo reported Bondi’s WMD characterization of Molotov cocktails in a Fox News appearance.
- It does not establish: that all Tesla protesters had WMDs, that peaceful demonstrators carried out the reported attacks, or that the government formally declared a “War on Terror” against them.
- It leaves unverified here: the full interview transcript and an independently confirmed FBI incident count.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
