Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Tesla shareholders approved Elon Musk’s 2025 CEO Performance Award on November 6, 2025. That means the “likely approval” in the original October headline became an actual vote outcome—but it does not mean Tesla paid Musk $1 trillion or that he immediately received that amount in cash or unrestricted stock.
The approved award covers 423,743,904 Tesla shares. Its possible future value could approach $1 trillion if Tesla reaches a series of extraordinary market-capitalization and operating milestones and Musk satisfies lengthy service requirements. The package faced opposition from proxy advisers, major institutional investors, labor groups, and corporate-governance critics before the vote.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The headline needs a date update
The original wording described the campaign against Musk’s compensation plan in October 2025, before Tesla’s annual meeting. Since then, Tesla shareholders voted on the proposal and approved it as Proposal 4 at the company’s November 6, 2025 annual meeting.
The certified result was:
| Vote | Shares |
|---|---|
| For | 1,892,235,822 |
| Against | 564,940,908 |
| Abstained | 12,227,846 |
| Broker non-votes | 302,456,274 |
The same filing recorded approval of Tesla’s amended and restated 2019 Equity Incentive Plan and other management proposals. The vote establishes that shareholders approved the 2025 award; it does not establish that Musk has already realized its maximum value.
#1 Best Overall
What Tesla approved
Tesla’s 2025 CEO Performance Award is a performance-based restricted-stock award, not a guaranteed salary, cash bonus, or immediate $1 trillion payment.
The award covers:
- 423,743,904 Tesla shares in total;
- 12 equal tranches of 35,311,992 shares each; and
- approximately 12% of Tesla’s adjusted share count, according to the company’s disclosure.
Tesla assigned the award a preliminary aggregate fair value of $87.75 billion for accounting purposes. That figure is different from the public “up to $1 trillion” figure. The accounting value estimates the award under the relevant valuation methodology; the trillion-dollar figure refers to what the shares might be worth in the future if Tesla and the award satisfy the highest conditions.
Neither figure means Tesla handed Musk that amount of cash. The ultimate economic value depends on Tesla’s future share price, the number of shares that are actually earned, and the award’s vesting and service conditions.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Why the award could be described as worth up to $1 trillion
The $1 trillion description is a contingent maximum, not a present transfer of wealth. Musk must clear both valuation and operating hurdles for the tranches to be earned. The shares also remain subject to long service requirements.
In practical terms, the plan is designed to pay more only if Tesla becomes substantially more valuable and achieves ambitious business results. If the milestones are not met, the corresponding tranches are not earned under the award’s conditions.
The market-capitalization hurdles
The 12 valuation milestones start at $2 trillion and rise to $8.5 trillion:
| Tranches | Market-capitalization milestones |
|---|---|
| 1 through 10 | $2 trillion through $6.5 trillion, generally increasing in $500 billion steps |
| 11 | $7.5 trillion |
| 12 | $8.5 trillion |
These are not ordinary annual revenue targets. They require Tesla’s market value to reach levels far above the starting hurdle. Each tranche also has operational conditions; reaching a market-capitalization threshold alone is not the whole test.
Rank #2
The operating milestones
Tesla’s disclosed operating conditions include targets involving several parts of its automotive, software, robotics, and autonomous-driving strategy:
- 20 million Tesla vehicles delivered;
- 10 million active Full Self-Driving subscriptions;
- 1 million bots delivered;
- 1 million robotaxis in commercial operation; and
- adjusted-EBITDA milestones ranging from $50 billion to $400 billion, including repeated requirements at the high end.
The award’s conditions combine these types of milestones with the market-capitalization hurdles. The public shorthand can therefore obscure how much has to happen before the maximum number of shares becomes available.
Service requirements last years
Even after a performance milestone is achieved, Musk does not necessarily receive freely available shares immediately. Tesla’s disclosure includes continued-service requirements.
- Shares earned before the fifth anniversary generally vest after a 7.5-year post-milestone service period.
- Shares earned later generally vest after a 10-year period.
- Musk must remain in qualifying service as Tesla’s chief executive or in another qualifying product-development or operations role.
That structure matters because “Tesla reaches a milestone” and “Musk has fully vested, realizable shares” are separate events.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Why investors and governance groups opposed the plan
Opposition did not come from a single bloc, and the critics did not all make the same argument. Their concerns generally fell into four categories: the size of the award, dilution, governance, and Tesla’s dependence on Musk.
Proxy advisers recommended against it
Institutional Shareholder Services, or ISS, recommended that shareholders reject the 2025 CEO Performance Award in October 2025. ISS argued that the proposal created extraordinarily large future pay opportunities and limited the board’s ability to adjust compensation later.
Glass Lewis subsequently also recommended voting against the package. Proxy recommendations can influence institutional voting, but they are recommendations rather than binding instructions, and they do not determine the outcome by themselves.
Rank #3
- Ideal for Gifting
- Must try for a book lover
- Comes with Proper Binding
Norges Bank cited size, dilution, and key-person risk
Norges Bank Investment Management, which manages Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, announced that it would vote against the award. Its stated concerns included:
- the overall size of the award;
- potential dilution for existing shareholders; and
- key-person risk—the possibility that Tesla is unusually dependent on one individual.
NBIM also acknowledged Musk’s visionary role. That distinction is important: an investor can recognize a chief executive’s importance while still concluding that a proposed compensation structure creates too much dilution or governance risk.
Other shareholder and public critics raised broader concerns
Additional opposition came from CalPERS, the SOC Investment Group, state financial officials, labor organizations, shareholder advocates, and corporate-governance groups.
The Take Back Tesla campaign, supported by labor and watchdog organizations, urged shareholders to reject the award. Its criticism connected the pay dispute with concerns about Musk’s political activity, management attention, Tesla’s reputation, and the company’s governance.
Americans for Financial Reform also publicized polling showing general-public opposition to the package. That polling should not be treated as a proxy for the shareholder vote: public opinion and the voting power of Tesla shareholders are different measures, and the certified vote—not a general-population survey—determined the result.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCritics also questioned whether some operating milestones could be achieved without delivering the complete transformation implied by the headline valuation. Those are governance and incentive-design arguments, not established findings that the award will fail or succeed.
Tesla’s argument for approving the award
Tesla’s board and supporters presented a different risk calculation. They argued that Musk’s leadership was central to the company’s plans for artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, robotics, and related businesses. In that view, the award gives Musk a powerful reason to remain focused on Tesla and rewards him only if the company achieves exceptional results.
Board Chair Robyn Denholm warned before the meeting that Musk might not remain sufficiently committed to Tesla if shareholders rejected the package. Tesla and its supporters described the award as entirely performance-based and argued that shareholders could benefit substantially if the milestones were achieved.
That is Tesla management’s and the board’s rationale, not an independent guarantee of future performance. The opposing analyses from ISS, Glass Lewis, NBIM, and shareholder groups reflect a different judgment about whether the incentives are appropriately structured and whether the potential cost to shareholders is justified.
Recommended Free Tools
Approval is not the same as immediate compensation
Three distinctions prevent the most misleading interpretation of the vote:
- Approval is not immediate payment. Musk did not receive $1 trillion in cash when shareholders approved Proposal 4.
- Potential value is not realized value. The award could be worth up to the widely reported amount only if Tesla reaches its highest milestones and the resulting shares become extremely valuable.
- Accounting expense is not cash paid. Stock-based compensation recorded in Tesla’s financial statements reflects accounting treatment, not a cash transfer or proof that the award has reached its maximum economic value.
Tesla’s 2025 annual filing reported that, as of December 31, 2025, the company had recorded $162 million of stock-based compensation expense related to the 2025 CEO Performance Award. Tesla also estimated additional unrecognized expense based on whether certain operational milestones were considered probable or not probable. Those estimates can change as circumstances and expectations change.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How this fits with Tesla’s earlier compensation litigation
The 2025 award is part of a wider compensation history, but it should not be confused with Tesla’s earlier awards.
Tesla’s 2018 CEO Performance Award was rescinded by the Delaware Court of Chancery and later reinstated by the Delaware Supreme Court, according to Tesla’s 2026 quarterly disclosure. Tesla also stated that its separate 2025 CEO Interim Award was forfeited in April 2026 after the 2018 award was restored. The company described that result as consistent with a “no double dip” principle.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →The forfeiture of the interim award does not cancel or rewrite the separate 2025 CEO Performance Award approved by shareholders in November 2025. These are different compensation arrangements with different histories.
Best Value
Further research
Readers who want to follow future Tesla filings, shareholder developments, and compensation disclosures may find independent investor research or a reputable financial-news service useful. Compare the company’s filings with independent governance analysis, and do not treat a research subscription or proxy recommendation as investment advice or as a substitute for reviewing the underlying documents.
What the vote means for Tesla shareholders
The vote settled the immediate authorization question in Musk’s favor, but it did not settle the underlying debate. Supporters see the award as a way to retain the leader they believe is essential to Tesla’s next phase. Opponents see a very large potential transfer of equity, substantial dilution risk, and a governance structure that may leave the company too dependent on Musk.
The most accurate description is therefore not “Tesla paid Musk $1 trillion.” It is: Tesla shareholders approved a contingent performance-based stock award covering 423.7 million shares, with a possible future value approaching $1 trillion if unusually demanding valuation, operating, and service conditions are met.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesSource note: Tesla and SEC filings control the award’s share count, milestones, vesting conditions, vote totals, and accounting treatment. NBIM’s own announcement controls its stated voting rationale. Proxy-adviser, labor-group, shareholder-campaign, and polling claims should be understood as attributed positions rather than neutral findings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Tesla pay Elon Musk $1 trillion?
No. The $1 trillion figure is a media shorthand for the potential future value of a contingent stock award. Musk must meet market-capitalization and operational milestones and satisfy years of service requirements. It was not a $1 trillion cash payment.
How many Tesla shares are covered by Musk’s 2025 award?
The award covers 423,743,904 shares, divided into 12 equal tranches of 35,311,992 shares. Tesla said that represented approximately 12% of its adjusted share count.
What did Tesla shareholders decide?
At Tesla’s November 6, 2025 annual meeting, shareholders approved Proposal 4, the 2025 CEO Performance Award, by 1,892,235,822 votes for to 564,940,908 against, with 12,227,846 abstentions and 302,456,274 broker non-votes.
What milestones must Musk and Tesla meet?
The award includes 12 market-capitalization hurdles from $2 trillion to $8.5 trillion, along with operational targets involving vehicle deliveries, active Full Self-Driving subscriptions, bots, robotaxis, and adjusted EBITDA ranging from $50 billion to $400 billion.
Is the 2025 award the same as Tesla’s 2018 compensation award?
No. They are separate awards. Tesla’s later disclosure said the earlier 2018 award was restored by the Delaware Supreme Court, while a separate 2025 CEO Interim Award was forfeited in April 2026. That development should not be confused with the 2025 CEO Performance Award approved in November 2025.
The Bottom Line
Bottom line: The pre-vote “likely approval” became actual approval on November 6, 2025. But Musk did not receive a $1 trillion paycheck. Tesla approved a 423.7-million-share performance award whose maximum future value could approach $1 trillion only if Tesla reaches market-value and operating milestones that include an $8.5 trillion valuation hurdle, while Musk remains in qualifying service for the required vesting periods.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
